GIND vs. NDIA

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) are both India Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -11.49% vs -9.19% for NDIA. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GIND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for NDIA.

Performance

GIND vs. NDIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIND achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly higher than NDIA's -8.77% return.

GIND

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: -6.25%
• YTD: -8.22%
• 1Y: -11.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NDIA

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: -7.66%
• YTD: -8.77%
• 1Y: -9.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIND vs. NDIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-8.22%	4.70%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	-8.77%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GIND and NDIA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.88

The correlation between GIND and NDIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GIND vs. NDIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GIND	NDIA
Financial Services	29.7%	31.4%
Consumer Cyclical	16.1%	11.0%
Industrials	12.0%	10.7%
Basic Materials	7.9%	8.6%
Healthcare	7.4%	4.4%
Technology	6.8%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	5.9%
Utilities	3.6%	3.6%
Energy	3.1%	9.5%
Communication Services	2.2%	5.5%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.5%

Return for Risk

GIND vs. NDIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 4
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NDIA

NDIA Risk / Return Rank: 4
NDIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NDIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NDIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NDIA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIND vs. NDIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIND	NDIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	-0.57	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	-0.74	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.92	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	-0.54	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	-1.25	+0.09

GIND vs. NDIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIND Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the NDIA Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIND and NDIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIND vs. NDIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, roughly equal to the maximum NDIA drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and NDIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIND	NDIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.97%	-22.05%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.27%	-17.09%	-5.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.98%	-15.41%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-7.40%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.88%	7.34%	+2.54%

Volatility

GIND vs. NDIA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) at 4.42%. This indicates that GIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIND	NDIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.42%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.62%	14.03%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	16.09%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	15.59%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	15.59%	+1.50%

GIND vs. NDIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NDIA's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIND vs. NDIA - Dividend Comparison

GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	1.20%	1.10%	3.66%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIND and NDIA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GIND and NDIA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GIND or NDIA?

GIND has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to NDIA (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs NDIA's -22.05%.

Which ETF is better, GIND or NDIA?

On 1-year performance, NDIA leads with -9.19% vs -11.49% for GIND. On fees, GIND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NDIA has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GIND or NDIA?

Over the 1-year period, NDIA has performed better with a -9.19% return vs -11.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIND or NDIA?

GIND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for NDIA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIND or NDIA?

NDIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.

What is the main difference between GIND and NDIA?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GIND and 0.76% for NDIA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NDIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.