GIND vs. IBIC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIND is a India Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. GIND is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -4.06% vs 4.02% for IBIC. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GIND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

GIND vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIND achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.67% return.

GIND

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 2.45%
• 6M: -1.35%
• YTD: -4.76%
• 1Y: -4.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.22%

IBIC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 2.37%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 1Y: 4.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	$322.48K	$247.32K	$253.29K
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	$1.04M	$809.24K	$530.96K

GIND vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-4.76%	4.70%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.67%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GIND and IBIC is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	-0.26

Return for Risk

GIND vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 7
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 8

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIND vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIND	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	4.57	-4.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.23	8.08	-8.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	2.09	-1.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	15.07	-15.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	51.54	-51.96

GIND vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIND Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIND and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIND vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIND	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.97%	-0.90%	-22.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.90%	-0.27%	-21.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.71%	-0.08%	-9.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-0.10%	-7.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.75%	0.08%	+9.67%

Volatility

GIND vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that GIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIND	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	0.23%	+4.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.43%	0.69%	+13.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	0.89%	+16.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	1.54%	+15.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	1.54%	+15.53%

GIND vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIND vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	4.62%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIND and IBIC in my portfolio?

GIND and IBIC have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIND or IBIC?

GIND has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, GIND or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.02% vs -4.06% for GIND. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GIND or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.02% return vs -4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIND or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIND or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.

What is the main difference between GIND and IBIC?

GIND is categorized as India Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GIND and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.