GIND vs. GSG
GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GIND is a India Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. GIND is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -11.49% vs 39.13% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
GIND vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIND achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 35.21% return.
GIND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -11.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- YTD
- 35.21%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
GIND vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF | -8.22% | 4.70% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 35.21% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIND and GSG is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIND vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
GIND
GSG
GIND vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIND | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.30 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 2.09 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 7.02 | -8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIND vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIND | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.97% | -89.62% | +66.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | -18.81% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.98% | -59.18% | +46.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -63.69% | +56.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.88% | 5.59% | +4.29% |
Volatility
GIND vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) is 4.88%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that GIND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIND | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 7.27% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 21.53% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 23.45% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 22.80% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 22.00% | -4.91% |
GIND vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GIND and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
GIND vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GIND nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIND and GSG have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to GIND (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 39.13% vs -11.49% for GIND. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, GIND has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 39.13% return vs -11.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIND and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
GIND and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GIND is categorized as India Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIND and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer