GIND vs. AAAU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIND is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. GIND is actively managed, while AAAU is passively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -9.96% vs 19.69% for AAAU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.

Performance

GIND vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GIND having a -7.56% return and AAAU slightly lower at -7.64%.

GIND

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: -7.56%
• 6M: -7.43%
• 1Y: -9.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAU

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -11.57%
• YTD: -7.64%
• 6M: -11.09%
• 1Y: 19.69%
• 3Y*: 27.36%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIND vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-7.56%	4.70%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	-7.64%	37.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GIND and AAAU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

GIND vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 5
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 5

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 21
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIND vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIND	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	0.72	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.79	1.06	-1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.16	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	0.76	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	2.15	-3.13

GIND vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIND Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIND and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIND vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIND	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.97%	-26.14%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.97%	-26.14%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.35%	-26.14%	+13.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-6.29%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.13%	9.19%	+0.94%

Volatility

GIND vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) is 5.17%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that GIND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIND	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	8.57%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.43%	24.35%	-9.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.70%	27.48%	-10.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	18.13%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	17.19%	+0.03%

GIND vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIND vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GIND nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIND and AAAU in my portfolio?

GIND and AAAU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIND or AAAU?

AAAU has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to GIND (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs AAAU's -26.14%.

Which ETF is better, GIND or AAAU?

On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 19.69% vs -9.96% for GIND. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GIND has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GIND or AAAU?

Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 19.69% return vs -9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIND or AAAU?

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIND or AAAU?

GIND and AAAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GIND and AAAU?

GIND is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while AAAU is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GIND and 0.18% for AAAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.