GIN.L vs. ACWD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GIN.L (SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIN.L is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GIN.L returned 33.49%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for ACWD.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIN.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.

Performance

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GIN.L is traded in GBP, while ACWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIN.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than ACWD.L's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GIN.L has outperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 33.49%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.49% annualized return.

GIN.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 8.48%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: 33.49%

ACWD.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist	2.94%	3.55%	2.09%	1.50%	-3.30%	1,062.98%	3.81%	14.60%	1.51%	3.01%
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	11.99%	14.08%	19.81%	16.16%	-8.66%	19.89%	12.50%	21.02%	-4.51%	13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GIN.L and ACWD.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2015	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between GIN.L and ACWD.L has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GIN.L	ACWD.L
Utilities	41.4%	2.7%
Industrials	38.1%	10.9%
Energy	12.1%	4.3%
Healthcare	3.9%	8.0%
Real Estate	2.9%	1.7%
Communication Services	1.1%	9.0%
Technology	0.3%	29.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	9.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	4.9%
Basic Materials	0.0%	3.6%

Return for Risk

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIN.L

GIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
GIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ACWD.L

ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIN.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.50	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	3.47	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.47	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	4.38	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.27	16.69	-12.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIN.L and ACWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIN.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.50	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.88	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.87	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.84	-0.74

Drawdowns

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIN.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum ACWD.L drawdown of -25.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIN.L and ACWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIN.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.71%	-25.57%	+9.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.51%	-6.87%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.63%	-18.26%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.40%	-18.26%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.71%	-25.57%	+9.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.83%	-0.33%	-3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-3.56%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	1.81%	+0.17%

Volatility

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) is 1.91%, while SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that GIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIN.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.91%	3.71%	-1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.15%	9.35%	-3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.14%	12.02%	-3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.56%	14.27%	-4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	311.49%	15.40%	+296.09%

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIN.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIN.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GIN.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.80%	2.47%	87.32%	2.23%	2.37%	2.16%	2.30%	2.17%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIN.L and ACWD.L in my portfolio?

GIN.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GIN.L or ACWD.L?

On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIN.L or ACWD.L?

ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GIN.L.

What is the main difference between GIN.L and ACWD.L?

GIN.L is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. GIN.L tracks Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GIN.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.