PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GIN.L vs. HMWO.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GIN.LHMWO.L
YTD Return2.95%20.39%
1Y Return7.84%26.50%
3Y Return (Ann)0.22%9.09%
5Y Return (Ann)2.17%12.82%
Sharpe Ratio0.802.54
Sortino Ratio1.223.56
Omega Ratio1.141.49
Calmar Ratio0.724.04
Martin Ratio4.2718.32
Ulcer Index1.64%1.40%
Daily Std Dev8.77%10.06%
Max Drawdown-15.71%-25.48%
Current Drawdown-2.67%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between GIN.L and HMWO.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GIN.L achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than HMWO.L's 20.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.03%
9.21%
GIN.L
HMWO.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIN.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HMWO.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


GIN.L
SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for GIN.L: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for HMWO.L: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (GIN.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIN.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIN.L, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIN.L, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIN.L, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIN.L, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIN.L, currently valued at 4.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.47
HMWO.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 3.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 16.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.09

GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIN.L and HMWO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.03
2.58
GIN.L
HMWO.L

Dividends

GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Dividend Comparison

GIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMWO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GIN.L
SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
0.00%2.80%2.47%87.23%2.23%2.37%2.16%2.30%2.17%1.81%0.00%0.00%
HMWO.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF
1.42%1.60%1.75%1.27%1.55%1.97%2.11%1.91%1.84%1.86%1.72%1.95%

Drawdowns

GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIN.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum HMWO.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIN.L and HMWO.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.50%
-0.81%
GIN.L
HMWO.L

Volatility

GIN.L vs. HMWO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (GIN.L) is 2.44%, while HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that GIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.44%
2.93%
GIN.L
HMWO.L