GILS.L vs. GLTS.L
GILS.L (Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and GLTS.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF) are both European Government Bonds funds - GILS.L tracks the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks while GLTS.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GILS.L returned -3.32%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GLTS.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GILS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GLTS.L.
Performance
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GILS.L is traded in GBp, while GLTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLTS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILS.L achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than GLTS.L's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GILS.L has underperformed GLTS.L with an annualized return of -3.32%, while GLTS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 0.64% annualized return.
GILS.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- 1Y
- -0.97%
- 3Y*
- -0.50%
- 5Y*
- -6.57%
- 10Y*
- -3.32%
GLTS.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILS.L Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | -1.35% | 1.70% | -5.79% | 1.51% | -25.53% | -6.84% | 5.96% | 4.09% | -2.08% | -1.13% |
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 0.16% | 5.40% | 1.76% | 3.70% | -5.72% | -1.91% | 1.77% | 1.11% | 0.41% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILS.L and GLTS.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GILS.L and GLTS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L — Risk / Return Rank
GILS.L
GLTS.L
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILS.L | GLTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 1.21 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 3.86 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILS.L | GLTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 1.13 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | 0.24 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.37 | 0.24 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.34 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, which is greater than GLTS.L's maximum drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILS.L and GLTS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILS.L | GLTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.75% | -11.18% | -27.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -2.22% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.33% | -2.22% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.64% | -10.44% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.75% | -11.18% | -27.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.00% | -1.05% | -34.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -1.72% | -10.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 0.70% | +2.07% |
Volatility
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) at 0.85%. This indicates that GILS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILS.L | GLTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 0.85% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.64% | 2.01% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.67% | 2.39% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.11% | 3.25% | +6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 2.62% | +6.44% |
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GILS.L vs. GLTS.L - Dividend Comparison
GILS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILS.L Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 3.64% | 3.44% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 0.18% | 0.13% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.88% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILS.L and GLTS.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GILS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GILS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GLTS.L.
GILS.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks, while GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Lyxor and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for GILS.L and 0.15% for GLTS.L.
Find the right allocation for GILS.L and GLTS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer