PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GILS.L vs. GLTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L).

GILS.L and GLTA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GILS.L is a passively managed fund by Lyxor that tracks the performance of the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks. It was launched on Nov 10, 2010. GLTA.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on Jun 10, 2019. Both GILS.L and GLTA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		-1.19%1.70%-5.79%1.51%-25.53%-6.84%5.96%-1.08%
GLTA.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc		-1.21%4.99%-4.18%3.52%-25.15%-5.17%8.71%1.44%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GILS.L having a -1.19% return and GLTA.L slightly lower at -1.21%.

GILS.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
-0.45%
3Y*
-2.01%
5Y*
-6.49%
10Y*
-3.11%

GLTA.L

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-1.21%
6M
1.80%
1Y
2.77%
3Y*
0.21%
5Y*
-4.73%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc

Often compared with GILS.L:
GILS.L vs. GLT5.LGILS.L vs. JGRE.LGILS.L vs. EWUGILS.L vs. GIL5.LGILS.L vs. EU13.LGILS.L vs. JG15.LGILS.L vs. IGL5.L
Often compared with GLTA.L:
GLTA.L vs. GLT5.LGLTA.L vs. GBPG.LGLTA.L vs. PPAGLTA.L vs. XLUGLTA.L vs. VGOV.LGLTA.L vs. VETY.LGLTA.L vs. GLTY.L

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GLTA.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Return for Risk

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GILS.L
GILS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GILS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GILS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
GLTA.L
GLTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GILS.LGLTA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.07

0.42

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

0.61

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.08

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

0.59

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.13

1.90

-2.03

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILS.L and GLTA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GILS.LGLTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

0.42

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

-0.45

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.34

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.30

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between GILS.L and GLTA.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GILS.L nor GLTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
GLTA.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTA.L drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILS.L and GLTA.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GILS.LGLTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.75%

-36.99%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.53%

-4.85%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

-34.87%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.89%

-28.37%

-7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-18.85%

+7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.50%

+0.54%

Volatility

GILS.L vs. GLTA.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GILS.LGLTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.89%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

4.31%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.69%

6.51%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.05%

10.49%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.03%

10.34%

-1.31%