PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GLTS.LXLKQ.L
YTD Return0.96%31.79%
1Y Return3.61%43.85%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.63%18.28%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.32%25.39%
10Y Return (Ann)0.38%23.91%
Sharpe Ratio0.992.02
Sortino Ratio1.532.67
Omega Ratio1.211.34
Calmar Ratio0.512.84
Martin Ratio3.858.57
Ulcer Index0.87%4.76%
Daily Std Dev3.39%20.19%
Max Drawdown-11.18%-23.83%
Current Drawdown-3.32%-3.71%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between GLTS.L and XLKQ.L is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLTS.L achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 31.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTS.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 0.38%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.88%
18.99%
GLTS.L
XLKQ.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for GLTS.L: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for XLKQ.L: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTS.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLTS.L, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLTS.L, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLTS.L, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLTS.L, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLTS.L, currently valued at 5.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.005.52
XLKQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 3.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 11.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.11

GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTS.L and XLKQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.42
2.34
GLTS.L
XLKQ.L

Dividends

GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
2.76%1.30%0.18%0.13%0.46%0.60%0.39%0.52%0.88%0.98%0.67%0.44%
XLKQ.L
Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -23.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTS.L and XLKQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-19.55%
-2.62%
GLTS.L
XLKQ.L

Volatility

GLTS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) is 1.69%, while Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that GLTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.69%
5.08%
GLTS.L
XLKQ.L