PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILIX vs. ALSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILIX achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than ALSMX's 25.38% return.


GILIX

1D
1.49%
1M
2.13%
YTD
13.57%
6M
13.02%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
14.93%

ALSMX

1D
1.18%
1M
1.02%
YTD
25.38%
6M
23.53%
1Y
42.03%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GILIX
NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional
13.57%16.30%25.96%27.09%-21.88%28.43%18.05%0.28%
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
25.38%11.47%21.78%25.14%-20.12%16.58%16.01%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GILIX and ALSMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.90

The correlation between GILIX and ALSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILIX vs. ALSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILIX
GILIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ALSMX
ALSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ALSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILIXALSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

4.46

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.17

18.98

-5.81

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the ALSMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILIX and ALSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILIX drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, smaller than the maximum ALSMX drawdown of -97.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILIX and ALSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILIXALSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-97.87%

+62.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-9.42%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.24%

-97.87%

+79.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.40%

-97.87%

+70.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-96.43%

+95.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-28.48%

+22.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.21%

+0.12%

Volatility

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Volatility Comparison

NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILIXALSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

6.41%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

14.22%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

16.92%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

1,292.06%

-1,274.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

1,136.37%

-1,118.16%

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ALSMX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

GILIX vs. ALSMX - Dividend Comparison

GILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than ALSMX's 5.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
5.71%7.16%3.62%0.46%7.12%1.62%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GILIX
NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional
2.88%3.27%23.88%2.78%41.55%4.81%9.53%1.80%23.14%19.31%1.95%12.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


GILIX and ALSMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALSMX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to GILIX (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILIX dropped -35.61% vs ALSMX's -97.87%.

ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILIX and ALSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer