GILIX vs. SECUX
GILIX (NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional) and SECUX (Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - GILIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Guggenheim, while SECUX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, GILIX returned 14.08%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for SECUX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GILIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for SECUX.
Performance
GILIX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GILIX having a 10.41% return and SECUX slightly higher at 10.67%. Over the past 10 years, GILIX has outperformed SECUX with an annualized return of 14.08%, while SECUX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.
GILIX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.75%
SECUX
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 10.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GILIX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILIX NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional | 10.41% | 16.30% | 25.96% | 27.09% | -21.88% | 28.43% | 18.05% | 29.96% | -6.99% | 22.38% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 10.67% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILIX and SECUX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GILIX and SECUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILIX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank
GILIX
SECUX
GILIX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILIX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.88 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 2.73 | +5.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILIX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILIX drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILIX and SECUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILIX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.61% | -71.68% | +36.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -9.17% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.24% | -25.43% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.40% | -37.80% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -38.56% | +2.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -5.74% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -18.34% | +12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.97% | -0.44% |
Volatility
GILIX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX) is 4.54%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that GILIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILIX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.76% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 14.17% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 17.24% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 21.63% | -4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 21.23% | -3.03% |
GILIX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GILIX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison
GILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILIX NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional | 2.96% | 3.27% | 23.88% | 2.78% | 41.55% | 4.81% | 9.53% | 1.80% | 23.14% | 19.31% | 1.95% | 12.83% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILIX and SECUX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SECUX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to GILIX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILIX dropped -35.61% vs SECUX's -71.68%.
GILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILIX and SECUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer