GILD vs. KNT.TO
GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) and KNT.TO (K92 Mining Inc.) are both stocks. GILD operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while KNT.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, GILD returned 7.84%/yr vs 34.40%/yr for KNT.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GILD is traded in USD, while KNT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the KNT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than KNT.TO's -2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed KNT.TO with an annualized return of 7.84%, while KNT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 34.40% annualized return.
GILD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 15.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
KNT.TO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -21.20%
- YTD
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 54.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 34.40%
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.90% | 36.59% | 18.68% | -1.99% | 23.63% | 29.95% | -6.70% | 7.88% | -9.92% | 2.96% |
KNT.TO K92 Mining Inc. | -2.26% | 173.91% | 22.92% | -13.06% | 0.32% | -5.47% | 170.66% | 257.59% | 43.49% | -40.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILD and KNT.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011 | 0.01 |
The correlation between GILD and KNT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GILD:
$157.49B
KNT.TO:
CA$5.60B
GILD:
$7.35
KNT.TO:
$1.28
GILD:
17.09
KNT.TO:
12.69
GILD:
0.04
KNT.TO:
0.13
GILD:
5.30
KNT.TO:
5.84
GILD:
6.70
KNT.TO:
4.51
GILD:
$29.74B
KNT.TO:
$685.77M
GILD:
$18.74B
KNT.TO:
$495.11M
GILD:
$12.88B
KNT.TO:
$499.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILD vs. KNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GILD
KNT.TO
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILD | KNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.17 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.03 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 2.61 | -0.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, smaller than the maximum KNT.TO drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and KNT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILD | KNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -92.77% | +21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.59% | -38.65% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -38.65% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | -58.43% | +31.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.47% | -80.08% | +49.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -33.27% | +14.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -47.06% | +24.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 15.21% | -7.60% |
Volatility
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) is 7.95%, while K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a volatility of 18.25%. This indicates that GILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILD | KNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 18.25% | -10.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 40.03% | -21.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.62% | 50.85% | -24.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 49.59% | -25.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 58.57% | -33.05% |
Dividends
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Dividend Comparison
GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while KNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.54% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
KNT.TO K92 Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and K92 Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GILD vs. KNT.TO - Profitability Comparison
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
KNT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.77M and revenue of 232.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
KNT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 165.19M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
KNT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 114.72M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GILD and KNT.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GILD and KNT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer