PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILAX vs. MALVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GILAX vs. MALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund (MALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILAX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than MALVX's 22.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GILAX has underperformed MALVX with an annualized return of 10.11%, while MALVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.


GILAX

1D
1.11%
1M
1.32%
6M
4.73%
YTD
7.66%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
10.11%
ALL TIME*
9.56%

MALVX

1D
0.97%
1M
1.94%
6M
17.40%
YTD
22.59%
1Y
38.80%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
12.99%
ALL TIME*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GILAX vs. MALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILAX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund
7.66%16.30%19.60%12.26%-10.02%28.08%2.02%21.75%-9.73%11.44%
MALVX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund
22.59%18.38%15.39%13.74%-8.68%26.51%3.91%24.74%-7.74%15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GILAX and MALVX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1999

0.95

The correlation between GILAX and MALVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILAX vs. MALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GILAX
GILAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MALVX
MALVX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GILAX vs. MALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund (MALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILAXMALVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.58

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

5.55

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

25.78

-17.21

GILAX vs. MALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the MALVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILAX and MALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GILAX vs. MALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILAX drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, smaller than the maximum MALVX drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILAX and MALVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILAXMALVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.62%

-55.21%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-6.53%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.32%

-16.13%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.46%

-19.73%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-37.12%

-1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.19%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-8.70%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.41%

+0.57%

Volatility

GILAX vs. MALVX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund (MALVX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILAXMALVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.77%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

8.90%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

11.35%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

14.78%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

17.25%

+0.64%

GILAX vs. MALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILAX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MALVX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GILAX vs. MALVX - Dividend Comparison

GILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than MALVX's 10.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILAX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund
8.26%8.89%7.47%0.14%5.58%13.50%0.84%11.27%9.48%12.37%4.89%10.61%
MALVX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund
10.57%9.23%14.33%2.84%5.96%17.48%1.68%3.92%12.95%0.43%1.38%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


GILAX and MALVX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to MALVX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILAX dropped -47.62% vs MALVX's -55.21%.

MALVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILAX and MALVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer