GIGL vs. VCLT
GIGL (Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GIGL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
GIGL vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 1.27% return.
GIGL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- -1.73%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
GIGL vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 0.46% | 3.76% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGL and VCLT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGL vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
GIGL
VCLT
GIGL vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIGL | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.40 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
GIGL vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGL | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -34.31% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -14.12% | +13.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -8.16% | +7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
GIGL vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGL | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 7.93% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 12.77% | -8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 12.84% | -8.68% |
GIGL vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGL vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than VCLT's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 3.78% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.53% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GIGL and VCLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GIGL.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 3.78% for GIGL.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.04% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for GIGL and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer