GIGL vs. SCHI
GIGL (Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF) and SCHI (Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past year, GIGL returned 4.60% vs 4.78% for SCHI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GIGL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHI.
Performance
GIGL vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's 0.08% return.
GIGL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- —
GIGL vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 3.76% |
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.08% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGL and SCHI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GIGL and SCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGL vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank
GIGL
SCHI
GIGL vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGL | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.59 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 4.91 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGL vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHI drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and SCHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGL | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -20.67% | +17.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -3.01% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.48% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -5.63% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.98% | +0.03% |
Volatility
GIGL vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) is 1.10%, while Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that GIGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGL | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.19% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.33% | 3.31% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 4.13% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 6.67% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 7.36% | -3.20% |
GIGL vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGL vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison
GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than SCHI's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 4.20% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.08% | 4.99% | 5.11% | 4.27% | 3.10% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GIGL and SCHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHI has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to GIGL (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIGL dropped -3.13% vs SCHI's -20.67%.
On 1-year performance, SCHI leads with 4.78% vs 4.60% for GIGL. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHI has performed better with a 4.78% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GIGL.
SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 4.20% for GIGL.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.03% for SCHI.
SCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIGL and SCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer