GIGL vs. QCON
GIGL (Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. GIGL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
GIGL vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GIGL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIGL vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | -0.12% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGL vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIGL | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GIGL vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGL | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | 0.00% | -3.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | 0.00% | -0.71% |
Volatility
GIGL vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGL | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 0.00% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 0.00% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 0.00% | +4.16% |
GIGL vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGL vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 3.78% | 2.12% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GIGL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIGL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
GIGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for GIGL and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer