GIGB vs. SXRM.DE
GIGB (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and SXRM.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - GIGB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while SXRM.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB returned 0.31%/yr vs -1.07%/yr for SXRM.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIGB charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SXRM.DE.
Performance
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than SXRM.DE's -0.59% return.
GIGB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SXRM.DE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- 0.67%
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.58% | 1.68% | 8.80% | -15.80% | -1.64% | 9.86% | 15.05% | -2.76% | 2.45% |
SXRM.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.59% | 8.56% | -0.51% | 3.57% | -14.86% | -3.03% | 9.73% | 9.02% | 0.39% | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGB and SXRM.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GIGB and SXRM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GIGB
SXRM.DE
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGB | SXRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.93 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 2.74 | +3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, roughly equal to the maximum SXRM.DE drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and SXRM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGB | SXRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -23.31% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -4.02% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.69% | -7.24% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -20.90% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -10.34% | +9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -6.45% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.37% | -0.45% |
Volatility
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) is 1.43%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that GIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGB | SXRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 1.86% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | 3.41% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 4.60% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.25% | 7.38% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 6.30% | +1.36% |
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRM.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GIGB vs. SXRM.DE - Dividend Comparison
GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while SXRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.69% | 4.45% | 3.67% | 3.12% | 2.25% | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 1.55% |
SXRM.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGB and SXRM.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GIGB.
GIGB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SXRM.DE is Government Bonds. GIGB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while SXRM.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GIGB and 0.07% for SXRM.DE.
Find the right allocation for GIGB and SXRM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer