GIGB vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GIGB (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. GIGB is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. GIGB charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

GIGB vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GIGB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.43%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: 5.10%
• 5Y*: 0.45%
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIGB vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	-0.02%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

GIGB vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIGB

GIGB Risk / Return Rank: 40
GIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIGB vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIGB	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIGB	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	—	—

Drawdowns

GIGB vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIGB	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	0.00%	-22.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	0.00%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	0.00%	-5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GIGB	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.30%	0.00%	+4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.26%	0.00%	+7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.67%	0.00%	+7.67%

GIGB vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIGB vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.61%	4.69%	4.45%	3.67%	3.12%	2.25%	2.62%	3.22%	3.31%	1.55%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GIGB or QCON?

On fees, GIGB is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIGB or QCON?

GIGB is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIGB or QCON?

GIGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between GIGB and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GIGB and 0.32% for QCON.