PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIF vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIF vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GIF

1D
0.00%
1M
12,389.21%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTIU

1D
2.79%
1M
-23.80%
6M
40.32%
YTD
40.32%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
-5.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIF vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIF and WTIU is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIF vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIF vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIFWTIUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

GIF vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIF vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIF drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIF and WTIU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIFWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.61%

-75.73%

+63.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-50.26%

+50.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-39.28%

+35.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.41%

Volatility

GIF vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIFWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23,333.19%

68.22%

+23,264.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23,333.19%

70.60%

+23,262.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23,333.19%

70.60%

+23,262.59%

GIF vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIF has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIF vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.48%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GIF and WTIU have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GIF.

GIF has the higher dividend yield at 109.48%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

GIF is categorized as Derivative Income, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GIF and 0.95% for WTIU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIF and WTIU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer