GIF vs. WTIU
GIF (REX Growth & Income Universe ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GIF is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). GIF is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. GIF charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
GIF vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GIF
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- -9.43%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 77.62%
- 6M
- 54.36%
- 1Y
- 102.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIF vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF | -0.71% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 11.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIF and WTIU is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIF vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
GIF
WTIU
GIF vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIF | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.12 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
GIF vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIF drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIF and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIF | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -75.73% | +63.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.67% | -37.04% | +25.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -39.18% | +35.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.05% | — |
Volatility
GIF vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIF | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.85% | 67.36% | -30.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.85% | 70.60% | -33.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.85% | 70.60% | -33.75% |
GIF vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIF has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIF vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF | 9.40% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIF and WTIU have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GIF.
GIF has the higher dividend yield at 9.40%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
GIF is categorized as Derivative Income, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GIF and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for GIF and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer