GIF vs. WTIU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GIF (REX Growth & Income Universe ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GIF is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). GIF is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Their -0.24 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GIF charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.

Performance

GIF vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GIF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

WTIU

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: 45.95%
• 6M: 51.31%
• YTD: 104.80%
• 1Y: 114.64%
• 3Y*: 0.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	$1.32M	$870.89K	$849.27K

GIF vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF	12,941.67%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	30.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GIF and WTIU is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026	-0.24

Return for Risk

GIF vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 55
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIF vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIF	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.09	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GIF	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-75.73%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-75.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.41%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-39.21%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GIF	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	57.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	69.90%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	70.86%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	70.86%	—

GIF vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIF has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIF vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.48%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF	109.48%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIF and WTIU in my portfolio?

GIF and WTIU have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GIF or WTIU?

On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIF or WTIU?

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIF or WTIU?

GIF has the higher dividend yield at 109.48%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between GIF and WTIU?

GIF is categorized as Derivative Income, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GIF and 0.95% for WTIU.