PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GICIX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GICIX achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly higher than GCIIX's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GICIX has underperformed GCIIX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while GCIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


GICIX

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.45%
YTD
14.59%
6M
18.66%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
9.96%

GCIIX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
12.60%
6M
15.21%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
14.59%42.83%5.57%15.11%-18.53%13.03%7.69%21.59%-18.80%33.05%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
12.60%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GICIX and GCIIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.94

The correlation between GICIX and GCIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GICIX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GICIX
GICIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GICIXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

1.96

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

2.72

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.43

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.31

9.08

+1.23

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GICIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GICIX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GICIXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.96

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.76

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.32

+0.09

Drawdowns

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GICIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, smaller than the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICIX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GICIXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-61.08%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-12.33%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.39%

-13.25%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-30.58%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.84%

-39.85%

-3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

0.00%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-15.04%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.29%

+0.27%

Volatility

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) is 4.45%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that GICIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GICIXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.87%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

12.70%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

15.30%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.11%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

16.79%

+0.01%

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GICIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GICIX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

GICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than GCIIX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.91%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
7.06%8.08%4.77%3.04%3.10%3.39%1.87%3.47%1.68%8.29%2.79%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GICIX and GCIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCIIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GICIX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GICIX dropped -56.71% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

GICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GICIX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer