GIBIX vs. GILIX
GIBIX (Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund) and GILIX (NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional) are both mutual funds - GIBIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Guggenheim, while GILIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, GIBIX returned 2.77%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for GILIX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GIBIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for GILIX.
Performance
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIBIX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than GILIX's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GIBIX has underperformed GILIX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while GILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.
GIBIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
GILIX
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 25.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | 0.30% | 8.22% | 3.18% | 7.45% | -16.38% | -0.58% | 14.94% | 4.45% | 0.89% | 6.50% |
GILIX NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional | 11.33% | 16.30% | 25.96% | 27.09% | -21.88% | 28.43% | 18.05% | 29.96% | -6.99% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIBIX and GILIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | -0.03 |
The correlation between GIBIX and GILIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIBIX vs. GILIX — Risk / Return Rank
GIBIX
GILIX
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) and NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIBIX | GILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.67 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 11.56 | -6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIBIX drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum GILIX drawdown of -35.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIBIX and GILIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIBIX | GILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -35.61% | +14.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -10.19% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.93% | -18.24% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.44% | -27.40% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.44% | -35.61% | +14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -3.13% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -5.59% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 2.34% | -1.33% |
Volatility
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) is 1.23%, while NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional (GILIX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that GIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIBIX | GILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 6.69% | -5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 11.21% | -8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 13.57% | -9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 17.23% | -11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.78% | 18.19% | -13.41% |
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GILIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIBIX vs. GILIX - Dividend Comparison
GIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than GILIX's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | 5.11% | 5.03% | 4.71% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.36% | 4.80% | 2.38% | 3.25% | 3.38% | 4.68% | 4.39% |
GILIX NAA Large Core Fund Class Institutional | 2.93% | 3.27% | 23.88% | 2.78% | 41.55% | 4.81% | 9.53% | 1.80% | 23.14% | 19.31% | 1.95% | 12.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIBIX and GILIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILIX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to GIBIX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIBIX dropped -21.44% vs GILIX's -35.61%.
GILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIBIX and GILIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer