PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYIX vs. RTHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GHYIX having a 2.39% return and RTHAX slightly higher at 2.46%. Over the past 10 years, GHYIX has outperformed RTHAX with an annualized return of 3.70%, while RTHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.91% annualized return.


GHYIX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.80%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
3.70%

RTHAX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.56%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
2.39%3.92%5.74%7.34%-14.79%5.79%4.96%11.47%4.97%9.33%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.46%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYIX and RTHAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.80

The correlation between GHYIX and RTHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYIX vs. RTHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYIX
GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYIXRTHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.61

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.46

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

8.09

-0.35

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the RTHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYIX and RTHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYIXRTHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.34

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.12

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.59

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.67

+0.33

Drawdowns

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYIX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than RTHAX's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYIX and RTHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYIXRTHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-18.89%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.74%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-7.56%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-18.89%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-18.89%

-0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-3.73%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.83%

+0.15%

Volatility

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) at 1.10%. This indicates that GHYIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYIXRTHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.10%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

2.06%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

2.89%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.35%

5.12%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.39%

4.98%

+0.41%

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than RTHAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Dividend Comparison

GHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than RTHAX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
4.64%6.12%4.38%3.56%3.04%3.06%3.44%4.03%4.12%4.36%4.81%4.88%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.22%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYIX and RTHAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHYIX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to RTHAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYIX dropped -35.88% vs RTHAX's -18.89%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYIX and RTHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer