PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYIX vs. RTHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYIX achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than RTHAX's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GHYIX has outperformed RTHAX with an annualized return of 3.32%, while RTHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.63% annualized return.


GHYIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.40%
6M
0.45%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
3.32%
ALL TIME*
4.41%

RTHAX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.74%
6M
0.90%
YTD
1.73%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
2.63%
ALL TIME*
3.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
1.18%3.92%5.74%7.34%-14.79%5.79%4.96%11.47%4.97%9.33%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
1.73%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYIX and RTHAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.80

The correlation between GHYIX and RTHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYIX vs. RTHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GHYIX
GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHYIXRTHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.61

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.48

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

9.69

-1.61

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the RTHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYIX and RTHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYIX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than RTHAX's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYIX and RTHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYIXRTHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-18.89%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.74%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-7.07%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.75%

-18.87%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-18.89%

-0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.74%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-3.68%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.70%

+0.15%

Volatility

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYIXRTHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.04%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.29%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

2.85%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

5.14%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

4.99%

+0.41%

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than RTHAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYIX vs. RTHAX - Dividend Comparison

GHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, which matches RTHAX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
4.29%6.12%4.38%3.56%3.04%3.06%3.44%4.03%4.12%4.36%4.81%4.88%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.26%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYIX and RTHAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTHAX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to GHYIX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYIX dropped -35.88% vs RTHAX's -18.89%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYIX and RTHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer