GHYIX vs. AHMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX).
GHYIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 3, 2000. AHMFX is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Aug 1, 2008.
Performance
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYIX Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class | -0.69% | 3.92% | 5.74% | 7.34% | -14.79% | 5.79% | 4.96% | 11.47% | 4.97% | 9.33% |
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 | -0.48% | 6.03% | 6.45% | 7.04% | -12.44% | 5.49% | 4.61% | 9.12% | 1.80% | 9.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYIX achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than AHMFX's -0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GHYIX has outperformed AHMFX with an annualized return of 3.64%, while AHMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.
GHYIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.64%
AHMFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than AHMFX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GHYIX vs. AHMFX — Risk / Return Rank
GHYIX
AHMFX
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYIX | AHMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.10 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.99 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 3.26 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYIX | AHMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.38 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.75 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.52 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYIX and AHMFX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Dividend Comparison
GHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than AHMFX's 4.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYIX Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class | 4.71% | 6.12% | 4.38% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 3.06% | 3.44% | 4.03% | 4.12% | 4.36% | 4.81% | 4.88% |
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 | 4.27% | 5.58% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 2.71% | 3.44% | 3.60% | 3.68% | 3.88% | 4.19% | 3.74% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYIX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than AHMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYIX and AHMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYIX | AHMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.88% | -17.65% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -5.60% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.82% | -17.65% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.82% | -17.65% | -2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -2.70% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -2.38% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 1.69% | +0.62% |
Volatility
GHYIX vs. AHMFX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) at 1.08%. This indicates that GHYIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GHYIX | AHMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 1.08% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 1.86% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 6.45% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 4.82% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 4.53% | +0.84% |