GHYB vs. IBHG
GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - GHYB tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index while IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GHYB returned 8.96%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for IBHG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GHYB charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.
Performance
GHYB vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 1.15% return.
GHYB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -11.02% | 1.16% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.15% | 6.90% | 7.42% | 11.27% | -8.88% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYB and IBHG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between GHYB and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYB vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank
GHYB
IBHG
GHYB vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHYB | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 6.06 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 22.04 | -11.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHYB vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYB drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYB and IBHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYB | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -13.85% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -0.73% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -3.39% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.04% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -2.64% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.20% | +0.39% |
Volatility
GHYB vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.40%. This indicates that GHYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYB | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.40% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 1.51% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 2.09% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.70% | 6.33% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.26% | 6.33% | +1.93% |
GHYB vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYB vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison
GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than IBHG's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.79% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.07% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHYB and IBHG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHYB has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to IBHG (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYB dropped -21.48% vs IBHG's -13.85%.
On 3-year performance, GHYB leads with 8.96% vs 7.62% for IBHG. On fees, GHYB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GHYB has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GHYB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHG.
GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.
GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GHYB and 0.35% for IBHG.
IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHYB and IBHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer