GHY vs. XILSX
GHY (PGIM Global High Yield Fund) and XILSX (Pioneer ILS Interval Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GHY returned 4.42%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for XILSX. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GHY charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for XILSX.
Performance
GHY vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHY achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 10.56% return.
GHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- -1.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.38%
XILSX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 24.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.61M | $1.64M | $1.60M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GHY vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | -0.52% | 10.46% | 20.25% | 17.29% | -20.04% | 12.73% | 6.33% | 26.51% | -3.54% | 3.00% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 10.56% | 18.70% | 18.93% | 18.65% | 1.23% | -1.10% | 7.37% | 2.60% | -2.11% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHY and XILSX is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHY vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank
GHY
XILSX
GHY vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHY | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -78.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 41.59 | -40.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 229.02 | -229.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 1,520.09 | -1,520.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHY vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHY drawdown since its inception was -41.35%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHY and XILSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHY | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.35% | -14.53% | -26.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -0.10% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -2.36% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | -6.27% | -23.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.69% | 0.00% | -5.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -4.82% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 0.03% | +4.65% |
Volatility
GHY vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that GHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHY | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 0.67% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 1.62% | +7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.72% | 3.04% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 3.78% | +10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 3.90% | +11.45% |
GHY vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHY has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHY vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison
GHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than XILSX's 8.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 10.82% | 10.21% | 10.23% | 11.09% | 11.62% | 8.35% | 8.67% | 8.04% | 7.72% | 7.77% | 8.53% | 10.07% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 8.60% | 9.51% | 13.06% | 12.82% | 2.68% | 2.04% | 5.20% | 6.63% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHY and XILSX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHY has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to XILSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHY dropped -41.35% vs XILSX's -14.53%.
XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.89 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHY and XILSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer