GHY vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
GHY is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 26, 2012. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
GHY vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GHY vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | -3.98% | 10.46% | 20.25% | 17.29% | -20.04% | 12.73% | 6.33% | 26.51% | -3.54% | 4.38% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHY achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's -0.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GHY having a 6.97% annualized return and PRCPX not far behind at 6.83%.
GHY
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- -4.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GHY vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHY has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GHY vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
GHY
PRCPX
GHY vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHY | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 3.47 | -3.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | 5.52 | -5.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.93 | -0.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 4.53 | -4.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 21.08 | -22.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHY | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 3.47 | -3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.23 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.26 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.88 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between GHY and PRCPX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GHY vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
GHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, less than PRCPX's 12.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 10.82% | 10.21% | 10.23% | 11.09% | 11.62% | 8.35% | 8.67% | 8.04% | 7.72% | 7.77% | 8.53% | 10.07% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
GHY vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHY drawdown since its inception was -41.35%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHY and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHY | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.35% | -23.07% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -3.03% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | -14.34% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | -23.07% | -18.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -1.74% | -7.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -3.16% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.04% | 0.65% | +4.39% |
Volatility
GHY vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 1.10%. This indicates that GHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GHY | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 1.10% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 2.52% | +5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 4.11% | +12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 4.79% | +9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 5.45% | +9.84% |