GHY vs. PJFAX
GHY (PGIM Global High Yield Fund) and PJFAX (PGIM Jennison Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - GHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while PJFAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, GHY returned 7.03%/yr vs 19.80%/yr for PJFAX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHY charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for PJFAX.
Performance
GHY vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHY achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than PJFAX's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GHY has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 7.03%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.80% annualized return.
GHY
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- -2.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
PJFAX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.80%
GHY vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 1.61% | 10.46% | 20.25% | 17.29% | -20.04% | 12.73% | 6.33% | 26.51% | -3.54% | 4.38% |
PJFAX PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | 5.36% | 14.53% | 48.10% | 52.76% | -37.89% | 15.65% | 55.66% | 45.04% | -1.24% | 36.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHY and PJFAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2012 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHY vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank
GHY
PJFAX
GHY vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHY | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.69 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 2.12 | -2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHY vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHY drawdown since its inception was -41.35%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHY and PJFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHY | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.35% | -64.07% | +22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -17.76% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -24.05% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | -43.56% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | -43.56% | +2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -4.15% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -20.29% | +14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 5.78% | -1.16% |
Volatility
GHY vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) is 3.35%, while PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that GHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHY | PJFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 5.90% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 13.84% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 17.40% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 24.84% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 24.04% | -8.70% |
GHY vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHY has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHY vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison
GHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, less than PJFAX's 12.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 10.59% | 10.21% | 10.23% | 11.09% | 11.62% | 8.35% | 8.67% | 8.04% | 7.72% | 7.77% | 8.53% | 10.07% |
PJFAX PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | 12.73% | 13.42% | 24.62% | 7.23% | 2.77% | 14.67% | 9.02% | 16.27% | 6.06% | 5.85% | 4.12% | 6.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHY and PJFAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJFAX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to GHY (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHY dropped -41.35% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.
PJFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHY and PJFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer