PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHTA vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHTA vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 59.27% return.


GHTA

1D
0.27%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.24%
6M
1.10%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
-1.79%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
59.27%
6M
55.41%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTA vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GHTA
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF
2.24%10.06%3.92%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
59.27%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GHTA and USOY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.00

The correlation between GHTA and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHTA vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTA
GHTA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GHTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GHTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTA vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHTAUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

3.84

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

7.37

-4.66

GHTA vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHTA and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHTAUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.80

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.95

-0.35

Drawdowns

GHTA vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHTAUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-17.46%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-14.29%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-6.81%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-6.47%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

7.43%

-4.94%

Volatility

GHTA vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is 1.90%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that GHTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHTAUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

11.67%

-9.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.69%

27.26%

-21.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.11%

30.50%

-22.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

26.14%

-14.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.94%

26.14%

-14.20%

GHTA vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHTA vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than USOY's 56.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GHTA
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF
3.75%3.84%2.46%2.32%0.38%0.41%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
56.65%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHTA and USOY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to GHTA (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHTA dropped -13.92% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 54.64% vs 6.74% for GHTA. On fees, GHTA is cheaper at 1.21% per year. On volatility, GHTA has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 54.64% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GHTA is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 56.65%, compared with 3.75% for GHTA.

GHTA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 1.22% for USOY.

USOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHTA and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer