GHRS vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GHRS (GH Research PLC) is a stock, while VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 3 years, GHRS returned 24.15%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for VTV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GHRS vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GH Research PLC (GHRS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHRS achieves a 83.07% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 13.16% return.

GHRS

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: 9.26%
• YTD: 83.07%
• 6M: 51.47%
• 1Y: 87.05%
• 3Y*: 24.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: 18.69%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHRS vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GHRS GH Research PLC	83.07%	81.43%	20.69%	-40.33%	-58.34%	21.19%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	13.16%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GHRS and VTV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2021	0.18

Return for Risk

GHRS vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHRS

GHRS Risk / Return Rank: 73
GHRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
GHRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GHRS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GHRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
GHRS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 85
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHRS vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GH Research PLC (GHRS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GHRS	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.77	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.95	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.50	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	4.41	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	16.67	-13.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GHRS vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHRS and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GHRS	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	2.77	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.51	-0.47

Drawdowns

GHRS vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHRS drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHRS and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHRS	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.15%	-59.27%	-21.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.49%	-6.35%	-33.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.83%	-14.52%	-48.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.67%	0.00%	-16.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.88%	-7.87%	-45.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.98%	1.68%	+22.30%

Volatility

GHRS vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

GH Research PLC (GHRS) has a higher volatility of 15.82% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.48%. This indicates that GHRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GHRS	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.82%	2.48%	+13.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.54%	7.57%	+47.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.56%	10.12%	+68.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.81%	13.88%	+72.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.81%	16.66%	+70.15%

Dividends

GHRS vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

GHRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GHRS GH Research PLC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.85%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GHRS and VTV in my portfolio?

GHRS and VTV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GHRS or VTV?

GHRS has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHRS dropped -81.15% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.