PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHRS vs. CMPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GHRS vs. CMPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GH Research PLC (GHRS) and COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHRS achieves a 73.94% return, which is significantly lower than CMPS's 83.04% return.


GHRS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
73.94%
6M
69.66%
1Y
79.45%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
10Y*

CMPS

1D
0.80%
1M
6.94%
YTD
83.04%
6M
93.42%
1Y
172.79%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
-17.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHRS vs. CMPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GHRS
GH Research PLC
73.94%81.43%20.69%-40.33%-58.34%6.05%
CMPS
COMPASS Pathways plc
83.04%82.54%-56.80%8.97%-63.67%-32.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GHRS and CMPS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.29

The correlation between GHRS and CMPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GHRS:

$1.37B

CMPS:

$1.65B

EPS

GHRS:

-$0.91

CMPS:

-$1.73

PB Ratio

GHRS:

5.20

CMPS:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

GHRS:

$0.00

CMPS:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

GHRS:

-$268.00K

CMPS:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

GHRS:

-$58.38M

CMPS:

-$312.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHRS vs. CMPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHRS
GHRS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GHRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHRS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GHRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHRS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CMPS
CMPS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CMPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMPS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CMPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHRS vs. CMPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GH Research PLC (GHRS) and COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHRSCMPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.55

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

12.02

-8.71

GHRS vs. CMPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the CMPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHRS and CMPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHRS vs. CMPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHRS drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, smaller than the maximum CMPS drawdown of -96.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHRS and CMPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHRSCMPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.15%

-96.03%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.49%

-38.22%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.83%

-81.00%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.82%

-78.67%

+57.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.61%

-74.12%

+21.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.09%

16.74%

+7.35%

Volatility

GHRS vs. CMPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GH Research PLC (GHRS) is 18.92%, while COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) has a volatility of 22.02%. This indicates that GHRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHRSCMPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.92%

22.02%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.21%

67.98%

-11.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.16%

103.39%

-25.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.82%

80.05%

+6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.82%

82.24%

+4.58%

Dividends

GHRS vs. CMPS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GHRS nor CMPS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GHRS vs. CMPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GH Research PLC and COMPASS Pathways plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002022202320242025202600
(GHRS) Total Revenue
(CMPS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GHRS and CMPS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMPS has higher volatility (22.02%) compared to GHRS (18.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHRS dropped -81.15% vs CMPS's -96.03%.

CMPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHRS and CMPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer