GHQPX vs. MCDWX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GHQPX (American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund) and MCDWX (Manning & Napier Credit Series) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, GHQPX returned -0.11%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for MCDWX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GHQPX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for MCDWX.

Performance

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund (GHQPX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHQPX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's 0.45% return.

GHQPX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: -0.72%
• 1Y: 3.77%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -0.11%
• 10Y*: —

MCDWX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GHQPX American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund	-0.55%	7.36%	-0.60%	5.56%	-10.43%	-2.23%	3.40%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	0.45%	7.57%	4.13%	7.31%	-11.13%	0.01%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GHQPX and MCDWX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020	0.89

The correlation between GHQPX and MCDWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GHQPX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHQPX

GHQPX Risk / Return Rank: 10
GHQPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
GHQPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
GHQPX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
GHQPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
GHQPX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MCDWX

MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 42
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund (GHQPX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GHQPX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.83	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	2.66	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.36	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	2.48	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.81	8.03	-5.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHQPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHQPX and MCDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GHQPX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.83	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.34	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.59	-0.40

Drawdowns

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHQPX drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHQPX and MCDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHQPX	MCDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.77%	-15.96%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.00%	-2.17%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.13%	-4.22%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	-15.96%	-0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-1.06%	-2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-4.15%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	0.67%	+0.94%

Volatility

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund (GHQPX) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.04%. This indicates that GHQPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GHQPX	MCDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	1.04%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.15%	2.16%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.53%	2.94%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.34%	4.63%	+2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.61%	4.38%	+1.23%

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHQPX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GHQPX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

GHQPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than MCDWX's 4.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GHQPX American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund	3.53%	3.46%	3.54%	3.74%	1.66%	1.18%	3.14%	2.02%	1.71%	1.18%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	4.47%	4.83%	4.41%	4.48%	3.25%	4.45%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GHQPX and MCDWX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GHQPX and MCDWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GHQPX or MCDWX?

GHQPX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to MCDWX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHQPX dropped -17.77% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.