GHQPX vs. AHTPX
GHQPX (American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund) and AHTPX (American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund) are both mutual funds - GHQPX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by American Beacon, while AHTPX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by American Beacon. Over the past 5 years, GHQPX returned 0.05%/yr vs 5.30%/yr for AHTPX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHQPX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for AHTPX.
Performance
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHQPX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than AHTPX's 8.90% return.
GHQPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
AHTPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- —
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHQPX American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund | -0.09% | 7.36% | -0.60% | 5.56% | -10.43% | -2.23% | 4.31% | 4.02% | 0.16% |
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund | 8.90% | 7.76% | 6.73% | 13.48% | -16.81% | 13.63% | 5.18% | 26.87% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHQPX and AHTPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHQPX vs. AHTPX — Risk / Return Rank
GHQPX
AHTPX
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund (GHQPX) and American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHQPX | AHTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.43 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.93 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 7.97 | -5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHQPX drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum AHTPX drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHQPX and AHTPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHQPX | AHTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.77% | -19.23% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -7.26% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.13% | -12.89% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -19.23% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -1.86% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -5.64% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.66% | -0.92% |
Volatility
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund (GHQPX) is 1.81%, while American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that GHQPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHQPX | AHTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 2.23% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.28% | 6.83% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 9.40% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 9.65% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 8.94% | -3.33% |
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHQPX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than AHTPX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHQPX vs. AHTPX - Dividend Comparison
GHQPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than AHTPX's 7.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund | 7.33% | 7.98% | 4.80% | 3.63% | 5.07% | 18.73% | 0.54% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GHQPX American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund | 3.51% | 3.46% | 3.54% | 3.74% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 3.14% | 2.02% | 1.71% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHQPX and AHTPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AHTPX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to GHQPX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHQPX dropped -17.77% vs AHTPX's -19.23%.
AHTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHQPX and AHTPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer