GHAAX vs. SRV
GHAAX (VanEck Global Resources Fund) and SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GHAAX returned 5.95%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for SRV. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GHAAX charges 1.38%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SRV.
Performance
GHAAX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHAAX achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 29.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GHAAX has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of 5.95%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.
GHAAX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 34.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.62%
SRV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- YTD
- 29.09%
- 1Y
- 29.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 27.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $3.37M | $3.88M | $3.11M |
GHAAX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHAAX VanEck Global Resources Fund | 12.05% | 36.12% | -3.15% | -3.93% | 7.79% | 18.63% | 18.68% | 11.65% | -29.35% | -1.49% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 29.09% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHAAX and SRV is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GHAAX and SRV has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHAAX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank
GHAAX
SRV
GHAAX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Resources Fund (GHAAX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHAAX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.28 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 6.16 | +1.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHAAX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHAAX drawdown since its inception was -74.68%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHAAX and SRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHAAX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.68% | -92.97% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -13.13% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.65% | -26.26% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.74% | -26.26% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.93% | -81.70% | +18.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -9.94% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.61% | -48.40% | +23.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 4.85% | +0.05% |
Volatility
GHAAX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Global Resources Fund (GHAAX) is 4.03%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that GHAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHAAX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 9.19% | -5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.65% | 17.97% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.96% | 21.43% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 26.44% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 38.35% | -13.05% |
GHAAX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHAAX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHAAX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison
GHAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SRV's 16.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHAAX VanEck Global Resources Fund | 1.39% | 1.56% | 2.95% | 2.33% | 2.53% | 1.35% | 0.53% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.51% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 16.27% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHAAX and SRV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to GHAAX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHAAX dropped -74.68% vs SRV's -92.97%.
GHAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHAAX and SRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer