PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHAAX vs. FRNRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Resources Fund (GHAAX) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHAAX achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly lower than FRNRX's 14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GHAAX has underperformed FRNRX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while FRNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.


GHAAX

1D
-2.00%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
6.68%
6M
5.40%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
6.18%

FRNRX

1D
-1.90%
1M
-7.87%
YTD
14.67%
6M
14.08%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHAAX
VanEck Global Resources Fund
6.68%36.12%-3.15%-3.93%7.79%18.63%18.68%11.65%-29.35%-1.49%
FRNRX
Franklin Natural Resources Fund
14.67%30.43%1.28%3.25%30.52%74.38%-21.58%10.03%-23.78%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GHAAX and FRNRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 1995

0.92

The correlation between GHAAX and FRNRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHAAX vs. FRNRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHAAX
GHAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GHAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GHAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNRX
FRNRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Resources Fund (GHAAX) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHAAXFRNRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

4.46

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

18.41

-10.23

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FRNRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHAAX and FRNRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHAAX drawdown since its inception was -74.68%, smaller than the maximum FRNRX drawdown of -80.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHAAX and FRNRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHAAXFRNRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.68%

-80.54%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-9.01%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-19.65%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.74%

-26.29%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.93%

-70.71%

+7.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

-9.01%

-3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-23.79%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.18%

+1.36%

Volatility

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Resources Fund (GHAAX) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) at 6.06%. This indicates that GHAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHAAXFRNRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

6.06%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

13.65%

+4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.98%

17.24%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.17%

25.57%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.39%

28.53%

-3.14%

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHAAX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FRNRX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHAAX vs. FRNRX - Dividend Comparison

GHAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FRNRX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNRX
Franklin Natural Resources Fund
1.48%1.70%2.40%1.98%2.38%22.66%2.39%1.64%2.43%1.16%1.02%0.86%
GHAAX
VanEck Global Resources Fund
1.46%1.56%2.95%2.33%2.53%1.35%0.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GHAAX and FRNRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GHAAX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to FRNRX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHAAX dropped -74.68% vs FRNRX's -80.54%.

FRNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHAAX and FRNRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer