PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGTL vs. PSCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGTL vs. PSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGTL achieves a 21.20% return, which is significantly lower than PSCT's 43.09% return.


GGTL

1D
-5.78%
1M
5.30%
YTD
21.20%
6M
21.08%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
10Y*

PSCT

1D
-7.54%
1M
3.09%
YTD
43.09%
6M
38.33%
1Y
84.98%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGTL vs. PSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GGTL
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
21.20%19.78%11.07%18.17%-15.92%
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
43.09%18.63%-1.06%20.81%-20.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GGTL and PSCT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2022

0.84

The correlation between GGTL and PSCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGTL vs. PSCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGTL
GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCT
PSCT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGTL vs. PSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGTLPSCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

5.77

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.24

24.09

-7.85

GGTL vs. PSCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the PSCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGTL and PSCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGTLPSCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.78

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Drawdowns

GGTL vs. PSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGTL drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, smaller than the maximum PSCT drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGTL and PSCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGTLPSCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.65%

-40.44%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-14.80%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-33.96%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-8.29%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-7.90%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.54%

-1.06%

Volatility

GGTL vs. PSCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) is 8.93%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that GGTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGTLPSCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

12.14%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

22.48%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

30.71%

-12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

27.87%

-9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

26.77%

-8.88%

GGTL vs. PSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGTL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCT's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGTL vs. PSCT - Dividend Comparison

GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than PSCT's 0.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGTL
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
0.86%1.04%0.75%0.84%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.01%0.08%0.22%0.47%0.19%0.25%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGTL and PSCT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCT has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to GGTL (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGTL dropped -23.65% vs PSCT's -40.44%.

On 3-year performance, GGTL leads with 21.07% vs 20.42% for PSCT. On fees, PSCT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GGTL has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GGTL has performed better with a 21.07% return vs 20.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.02% for PSCT.

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GGTL and 0.29% for PSCT.

PSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGTL and PSCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer