GGTL vs. GABF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGTL is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GGTL returned 17.94%/yr vs 20.28%/yr for GABF. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGTL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

GGTL vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGTL achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -0.55% return.

GGTL

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: -4.97%
• 6M: 14.88%
• YTD: 17.96%
• 1Y: 27.15%
• 3Y*: 17.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: -4.09%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 1Y: -2.77%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGTL vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	17.96%	19.78%	11.07%	18.17%	4.91%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-0.55%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GGTL and GABF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between GGTL and GABF has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GGTL vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGTL	GABF
Technology	52.9%	5.2%
Communication Services	1.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	-
Industrials	0.1%	4.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	85.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GGTL vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGTL

GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 55
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGTL vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGTL	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	-0.16	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	-0.10	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.99	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	-0.16	+3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	-0.36	+9.30

GGTL vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGTL and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGTL vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGTL drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGTL and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGTL	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.65%	-20.86%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.20%	-17.16%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	-20.86%	-0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.17%	-5.44%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.37%	-4.95%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	7.80%	-4.76%

Volatility

GGTL vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.48%. This indicates that GGTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGTL	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.91%	4.48%	+5.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.45%	13.33%	+5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.63%	17.49%	+3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.42%	20.42%	-2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	20.42%	-2.00%

GGTL vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGTL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGTL vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than GABF's 1.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	1.97%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	0.88%	1.04%	0.75%	0.84%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGTL and GABF in my portfolio?

GGTL and GABF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGTL or GABF?

GGTL has higher volatility (9.91%) compared to GABF (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGTL dropped -23.65% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, GGTL or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 20.28% vs 17.94% for GGTL. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGTL or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 20.28% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGTL or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGTL or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.88% for GGTL.

What is the main difference between GGTL and GABF?

GGTL is categorized as Technology Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GGTL and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.