GGTL vs. GABF
GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGTL is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GGTL returned 21.07%/yr vs 20.79%/yr for GABF. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGTL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
GGTL vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGTL achieves a 21.20% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -5.27% return.
GGTL
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 21.20%
- 6M
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GABF
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -5.27%
- 6M
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -1.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGTL vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 21.20% | 19.78% | 11.07% | 18.17% | 5.64% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -5.27% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGTL and GABF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GGTL and GABF has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGTL vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
GGTL
GABF
GGTL vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGTL | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.00 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | -0.08 | +4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.24 | -0.18 | +16.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGTL | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | -0.07 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.89 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
GGTL vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGTL drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGTL and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGTL | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.65% | -20.86% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | -17.16% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | -20.86% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -9.93% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -4.87% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 7.32% | -4.84% |
Volatility
GGTL vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.93%. This indicates that GGTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGTL | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 4.93% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 13.24% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 17.54% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 20.56% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 20.56% | -2.67% |
GGTL vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGTL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGTL vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than GABF's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.07% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% |
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 0.86% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGTL and GABF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGTL has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to GABF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGTL dropped -23.65% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GGTL leads with 21.07% vs 20.79% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GGTL has performed better with a 21.07% return vs 20.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.
GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.86% for GGTL.
GGTL is categorized as Technology Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GGTL and 0.10% for GABF.
GGTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGTL and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer