GGTL vs. AOTG

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) and AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GGTL returned 22.42%/yr vs 27.31%/yr for AOTG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGTL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AOTG.

Performance

GGTL vs. AOTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGTL achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly higher than AOTG's 15.64% return.

GGTL

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: 9.20%
• YTD: 28.39%
• 6M: 29.22%
• 1Y: 47.47%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AOTG

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: 7.66%
• YTD: 15.64%
• 6M: 15.41%
• 1Y: 39.19%
• 3Y*: 27.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGTL vs. AOTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	28.39%	19.78%	11.07%	18.17%	6.88%
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	15.64%	25.26%	32.20%	54.58%	-11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GGTL and AOTG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022	0.72

The correlation between GGTL and AOTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGTL vs. AOTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGTL	AOTG
Technology	55.5%	67.4%
Communication Services	2.9%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	7.0%
Industrials	0.1%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	9.7%
Healthcare	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GGTL vs. AOTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGTL

GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 82
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 39
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGTL vs. AOTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGTL	AOTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.50	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.01	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.26	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.08	1.68	+3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.43	4.76	+12.67

GGTL vs. AOTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the AOTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGTL and AOTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGTL vs. AOTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGTL drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, smaller than the maximum AOTG drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGTL and AOTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGTL	AOTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.65%	-31.63%	+7.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.20%	-22.85%	+13.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	-27.41%	+5.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-3.24%	+2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-7.87%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	8.06%	-5.38%

Volatility

GGTL vs. AOTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) is 9.99%, while AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a volatility of 11.56%. This indicates that GGTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGTL	AOTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	11.56%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	21.00%	-4.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.85%	25.57%	-6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	29.51%	-11.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	29.51%	-11.45%

GGTL vs. AOTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGTL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AOTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGTL vs. AOTG - Dividend Comparison

GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	0.81%	1.04%	0.75%	0.84%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGTL and AOTG in my portfolio?

GGTL and AOTG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGTL or AOTG?

AOTG has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to GGTL (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGTL dropped -23.65% vs AOTG's -31.63%.

Which ETF is better, GGTL or AOTG?

On 3-year performance, AOTG leads with 27.31% vs 22.42% for GGTL. On fees, AOTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GGTL has been the lower-risk option at 9.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGTL or AOTG?

Over the 3-year period, AOTG has performed better with a 27.31% return vs 22.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGTL or AOTG?

AOTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGTL or AOTG?

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

What is the main difference between GGTL and AOTG?

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and AOT. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GGTL and 0.75% for AOTG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.