PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGSOX vs. MFWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund (GGSOX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGSOX achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than MFWIX's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GGSOX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 7.29%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.54% annualized return.


GGSOX

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
13.43%
6M
15.21%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
7.97%
5Y*
-3.13%
10Y*
7.29%

MFWIX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.19%
YTD
5.16%
6M
6.93%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
6.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGSOX
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund
13.43%2.60%-4.60%16.89%-39.55%20.91%40.70%32.07%-15.13%31.39%
MFWIX
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I
5.16%15.70%4.25%10.52%-10.62%8.59%9.63%18.49%-6.96%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GGSOX and MFWIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.77

The correlation between GGSOX and MFWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGSOX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGSOX
GGSOX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GGSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GGSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MFWIX
MFWIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MFWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MFWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund (GGSOX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGSOXMFWIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

1.94

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

2.82

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.13

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.33

7.61

-4.27

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the MFWIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGSOX and MFWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGSOXMFWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.94

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.54

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.68

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.72

-0.33

Drawdowns

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGSOX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGSOX and MFWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGSOXMFWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-33.01%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-6.73%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.76%

-8.63%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.71%

-20.22%

-28.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.71%

-23.36%

-25.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.13%

-1.21%

-24.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-3.82%

-13.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

1.88%

+2.02%

Volatility

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison

Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund (GGSOX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 2.14%. This indicates that GGSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGSOXMFWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

2.14%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

5.66%

+8.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

7.39%

+9.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

9.14%

+11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.81%

9.63%

+10.18%

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGSOX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGSOX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison

GGSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGSOX
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.11%0.00%10.61%3.19%1.62%3.30%1.63%0.08%0.00%
MFWIX
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I
8.34%8.77%9.36%3.98%2.94%10.71%7.53%4.70%3.64%2.36%1.40%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGSOX and MFWIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGSOX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to MFWIX (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGSOX dropped -48.71% vs MFWIX's -33.01%.

MFWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGSOX and MFWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer