GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO
GGRO.TO (iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio) and TGRO.TO (TD Growth ETF Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRO.TO returned 11.20%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for TGRO.TO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGRO.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TGRO.TO.
Performance
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRO.TO achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than TGRO.TO's 10.65% return.
GGRO.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TGRO.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- —
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio | 11.48% | 14.24% | 20.48% | 19.18% | -14.11% | 15.52% | 7.20% |
TGRO.TO TD Growth ETF Portfolio | 10.65% | 18.03% | 22.28% | 18.36% | -11.39% | 20.46% | 7.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRO.TO and TGRO.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GGRO.TO and TGRO.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GGRO.TO
TGRO.TO
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRO.TO | TGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.68 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 16.25 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRO.TO | TGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.67 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 1.15 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.10 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, which is greater than TGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRO.TO and TGRO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRO.TO | TGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -18.37% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -7.21% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.78% | -13.27% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | -18.37% | -3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | 0.00% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -3.45% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.63% | +0.29% |
Volatility
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) at 3.29%. This indicates that GGRO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRO.TO | TGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.29% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 8.12% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 9.95% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 11.69% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 994.74% | -983.17% |
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRO.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRO.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
GGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than TGRO.TO's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.38% | 1.51% | 1.62% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.43% | 0.83% |
TGRO.TO TD Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.77% | 2.03% | 2.04% | 2.17% | 2.46% | 1.58% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRO.TO and TGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GGRO.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GGRO.TO and 0.15% for TGRO.TO.
Find the right allocation for GGRO.TO and TGRO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer