PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGRO.TO (iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio) and FGRO.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRO.TO returned 11.20%/yr vs 14.69%/yr for FGRO.NEO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGRO.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for FGRO.NEO.

Performance

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRO.TO achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than FGRO.NEO's 9.39% return.

GGRO.TO

1D
-0.04%
1M
6.33%
YTD
11.48%
6M
8.73%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
—

FGRO.NEO

1D
0.54%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.21%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio		11.48%14.24%20.48%19.18%-14.11%13.57%
FGRO.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF		9.39%17.00%25.97%16.92%-6.29%16.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRO.TO and FGRO.NEO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.75

The correlation between GGRO.TO and FGRO.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GGRO.TO
FGRO.NEO

Technology

27.5%
20.6%

Financial Services

23.1%
22.2%

Industrials

7.0%
11.3%

Basic Materials

5.7%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
7.7%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
5.5%

Utilities

0.8%
4.6%

Energy

0.0%
4.4%

Technology

GGRO.TO
27.5%
FGRO.NEO
20.6%

Financial Services

GGRO.TO
23.1%
FGRO.NEO
22.2%

Industrials

GGRO.TO
7.0%
FGRO.NEO
11.3%

Basic Materials

GGRO.TO
5.7%
FGRO.NEO
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GGRO.TO
3.8%
FGRO.NEO
7.7%

Healthcare

GGRO.TO
3.7%
FGRO.NEO
4.4%

Real Estate

GGRO.TO
2.3%
FGRO.NEO
4.7%

Communication Services

GGRO.TO
2.3%
FGRO.NEO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

GGRO.TO
2.2%
FGRO.NEO
5.5%

Utilities

GGRO.TO
0.8%
FGRO.NEO
4.6%

Energy

GGRO.TO
0.0%
FGRO.NEO
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio

Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF

Often compared with GGRO.TO:
GGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOGGRO.TO vs. VFV.TOGGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOGGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TOGGRO.TO vs. ESGGGGRO.TO vs. GBAL.TOGGRO.TO vs. ESG
Often compared with FGRO.NEO:
FGRO.NEO vs. VGRO.TOFGRO.NEO vs. XGRO.TOFGRO.NEO vs. FBAL.NEOFGRO.NEO vs. VEQT.TOFGRO.NEO vs. ZGRO.TOFGRO.NEO vs. FGROFGRO.NEO vs. VFV.TO

Return for Risk

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGRO.TO
GGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO
FGRO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FGRO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGRO.TOFGRO.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.88
2.32

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.61
3.26

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.97

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

12.68

-1.02

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FGRO.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRO.TO and FGRO.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGRO.TOFGRO.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.32

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.40

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.38

-0.31

Drawdowns

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, which is greater than FGRO.NEO's maximum drawdown of -15.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRO.TO and FGRO.NEO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGRO.TOFGRO.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-15.23%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-7.54%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-11.45%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

-15.23%

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.37%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-2.52%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.76%

+0.16%

Volatility

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO) at 3.58%. This indicates that GGRO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGRO.TOFGRO.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.58%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

7.76%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

9.66%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

10.59%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

10.47%

+1.10%

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRO.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRO.NEO's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGRO.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Dividend Comparison

GGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than FGRO.NEO's 1.13% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FGRO.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF		1.13%1.24%1.09%1.39%4.58%0.94%0.00%
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio		1.38%1.51%1.62%1.89%1.69%1.43%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGRO.TO and FGRO.NEO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FGRO.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GGRO.TO and 0.42% for FGRO.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRO.TO and FGRO.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer