PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGRA.L is traded in USD, while VGVF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VGVF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than VGVF.DE's 11.28% return.


GGRA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
3.46%
YTD
5.13%
6M
6.21%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*

VGVF.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.49%
YTD
11.28%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
5.13%16.19%8.94%18.40%-13.65%19.40%15.00%
VGVF.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.28%23.05%17.60%24.16%-18.34%21.24%14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRA.L and VGVF.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2020

0.84

The correlation between GGRA.L and VGVF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRA.L
GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VGVF.DE
VGVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRA.LVGVF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.29

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

14.32

-7.94

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRA.L and VGVF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGRA.LVGVF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.39

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.78

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.78

0.00

Drawdowns

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum VGVF.DE drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and VGVF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGRA.LVGVF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-34.01%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-8.65%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-17.70%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-26.12%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.71%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-5.67%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.99%

+0.58%

Volatility

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) at 3.25%. This indicates that GGRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGRA.LVGVF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.25%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

9.07%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

11.94%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

15.35%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

17.51%

-2.60%

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VGVF.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGRA.L vs. VGVF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGRA.L nor VGVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GGRA.L and VGVF.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGVF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRA.L.

GGRA.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while VGVF.DE is Global Equities. GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while VGVF.DE tracks FTSE Developed. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRA.L and 0.12% for VGVF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and VGVF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer