GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L
GGRA.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and LDGG.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equity Income funds - GGRA.L tracks the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth while LDGG.L tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGRA.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for LDGG.L.
Performance
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGRA.L is traded in USD, while LDGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
GGRA.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
LDGG.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GGRA.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 4.95% |
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRA.L and LDGG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGRA.L
LDGG.L
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRA.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRA.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 2.10 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, which is greater than LDGG.L's maximum drawdown of -9.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and LDGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRA.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -9.10% | -21.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.88% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -2.81% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | — | — |
Volatility
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRA.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 13.05% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 13.05% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 13.05% | +1.86% |
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGG.L's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGRA.L vs. LDGG.L - Dividend Comparison
GGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GGRA.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% |
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRA.L and LDGG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGG.L is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGG.L is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRA.L.
GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while LDGG.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRA.L and 0.31% for LDGG.L.
Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and LDGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer