GGRA.L vs. INTL.L
GGRA.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GGRA.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRA.L returned 8.02%/yr vs 16.00%/yr for INTL.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGRA.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.
Performance
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGRA.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 48.66% return.
GGRA.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
INTL.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 18.66%
- YTD
- 48.66%
- 6M
- 49.24%
- 1Y
- 91.38%
- 3Y*
- 34.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- —
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRA.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 5.13% | 16.19% | 8.94% | 18.40% | -13.65% | 19.40% | 16.48% | 27.31% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 48.66% | 23.14% | 11.68% | 56.56% | -42.06% | 16.29% | 74.16% | 35.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRA.L and INTL.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between GGRA.L and INTL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Technology
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Industrials
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Healthcare
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Consumer Cyclical
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Communication Services
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Financial Services
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Consumer Defensive
GGRA.L
INTL.L
Basic Materials
GGRA.L
INTL.L
-
Utilities
GGRA.L
INTL.L
-
Real Estate
GGRA.L
INTL.L
-
Energy
GGRA.L
INTL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGRA.L
INTL.L
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRA.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.52 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 5.91 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 18.42 | -12.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRA.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 3.47 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.91 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and INTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRA.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -48.41% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -15.38% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -31.15% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | -46.21% | +21.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.19% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -13.96% | +9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 4.94% | -2.37% |
Volatility
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) is 3.51%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that GGRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRA.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 9.61% | -6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 19.60% | -9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 26.18% | -13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 27.54% | -12.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 28.09% | -13.18% |
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGRA.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGRA.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRA.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GGRA.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.
GGRA.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRA.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.
Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and INTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer