PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGRA.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and GGRP.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) are both exchange-traded funds - GGRA.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while GGRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRA.L returned 8.02%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for GGRP.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.

Performance

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGRA.L is traded in USD, while GGRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGRP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than GGRP.L's 4.55% return.

GGRA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
3.46%
YTD
5.13%
6M
6.21%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
—

GGRP.L

1D
0.44%
1M
3.87%
YTD
4.55%
6M
6.12%
1Y
15.21%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		5.13%16.19%8.94%18.40%-13.65%19.40%16.48%34.97%-11.18%23.16%
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD		4.55%15.14%8.02%17.51%-13.56%19.26%16.37%35.48%-10.63%22.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRA.L and GGRP.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2017

0.73

The correlation between GGRA.L and GGRP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GGRA.L
GGRP.L

Technology

21.6%
21.6%

Industrials

18.8%
18.8%

Healthcare

15.7%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
15.4%

Communication Services

8.6%
8.6%

Financial Services

8.4%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
7.2%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.7%

Utilities

0.4%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.2%

Energy

0.0%
0.0%

Technology

GGRA.L
21.6%
GGRP.L
21.6%

Industrials

GGRA.L
18.8%
GGRP.L
18.8%

Healthcare

GGRA.L
15.7%
GGRP.L
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GGRA.L
15.4%
GGRP.L
15.4%

Communication Services

GGRA.L
8.6%
GGRP.L
8.6%

Financial Services

GGRA.L
8.4%
GGRP.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

GGRA.L
7.2%
GGRP.L
7.2%

Basic Materials

GGRA.L
3.7%
GGRP.L
3.7%

Utilities

GGRA.L
0.4%
GGRP.L
0.4%

Real Estate

GGRA.L
0.2%
GGRP.L
0.2%

Energy

GGRA.L
0.0%
GGRP.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD

Often compared with GGRA.L:
GGRA.L vs. IWFQ.LGGRA.L vs. XMAW.LGGRA.L vs. JPGL.LGGRA.L vs. FGQD.LGGRA.L vs. DFIVGGRA.L vs. QQQGGRA.L vs. IMID.L
Often compared with GGRP.L:
GGRP.L vs. GGRG.LGGRP.L vs. FGQD.LGGRP.L vs. VHYG.LGGRP.L vs. HMWO.LGGRP.L vs. SCHDGGRP.L vs. QWLDGGRP.L vs. TDGB.L

Return for Risk

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGRA.L
GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
GGRP.L
GGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGRA.LGGRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.33
1.32

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.13
2.07

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.48

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

5.90

+0.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRA.L and GGRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGRA.LGGRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.53

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.86

-0.08

Drawdowns

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, roughly equal to the maximum GGRP.L drawdown of -30.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and GGRP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGRA.LGGRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-30.97%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-10.21%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-15.31%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-25.16%

+0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.79%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.57%

0.00%

Volatility

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) at 3.01%. This indicates that GGRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGRA.LGGRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.01%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

9.09%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

11.47%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

14.31%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

17.44%

-2.53%

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GGRA.L and GGRP.L have an expense ratio of 0.38%.

Dividends

GGRA.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison

GGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD		0.01%0.01%0.54%1.86%2.42%1.60%1.46%1.88%2.13%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGRA.L and GGRP.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRA.L and GGRP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

GGRA.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while GGRP.L is Global Equities. Both ETFs track WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and GGRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer