PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSF vs. VGMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSF vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSF achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than VGMS's 1.29% return.


TMSF

1D
0.04%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGMS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSF vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMSF and VGMS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSF vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMSF vs. VGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSFVGMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

2.18

-0.16

Drawdowns

TMSF vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and VGMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSFVGMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.46%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.16%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.31%

-0.07%

Volatility

TMSF vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSFVGMSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

3.21%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

3.21%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.93%

3.21%

-0.28%

TMSF vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSF vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than VGMS's 5.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMSF and VGMS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for TMSF.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.30% for VGMS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSF and VGMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer