PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGOV.L is traded in GBp, while XGSI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGSI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGOV.L achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than XGSI.L's -0.06% return.


GGOV.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-1.86%
1Y
0.56%
3Y*
-1.19%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*

XGSI.L

1D
0.02%
1M
1.14%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
0.05%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GGOV.L
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies
-1.07%-1.06%-1.97%-1.94%-7.40%-5.91%6.13%-8.77%
XGSI.L
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged
-0.06%-3.42%3.01%0.55%-3.00%-1.56%2.75%-8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GGOV.L and XGSI.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2019

0.53

The correlation between GGOV.L and XGSI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGOV.L
GGOV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XGSI.L
XGSI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGOV.LXGSI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.08

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

0.47

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

1.08

-0.86

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGOV.L and XGSI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGOV.LXGSI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.41

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.04

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

0.06

-0.57

Drawdowns

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGOV.L drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than XGSI.L's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV.L and XGSI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGOV.LXGSI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-22.36%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.67%

-6.10%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.70%

-9.18%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

-16.82%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-17.68%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-12.10%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.64%

-0.19%

Volatility

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) is 1.30%, while Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that GGOV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGSI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGOV.LXGSI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.92%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

5.22%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

6.93%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.20%

9.05%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

9.27%

-0.08%

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGOV.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XGSI.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GGOV.L vs. XGSI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGOV.L nor XGSI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GGOV.L and XGSI.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGOV.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGOV.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGSI.L.

GGOV.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XGSI.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GGOV.L and 0.25% for XGSI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGOV.L and XGSI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer