PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGMMX vs. MFWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGMMX achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than MFWIX's 8.22% return.


GGMMX

1D
1.27%
1M
-1.53%
6M
12.68%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.62%

MFWIX

1D
0.77%
1M
2.18%
6M
4.54%
YTD
8.22%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
6.60%
ALL TIME*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GGMMX
Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund
17.68%10.57%1.65%39.12%-16.24%19.30%15.86%3.52%
MFWIX
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I
8.22%15.70%4.25%10.52%-10.62%8.59%9.63%9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GGMMX and MFWIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2019

0.68

The correlation between GGMMX and MFWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGMMX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GGMMX
GGMMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GGMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GGMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MFWIX
MFWIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MFWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MFWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGMMXMFWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.21

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

7.81

+3.86

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGMMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the MFWIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGMMX and MFWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGMMX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGMMX and MFWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGMMXMFWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-33.01%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-6.73%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-8.51%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-20.22%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

0.00%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-3.80%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.90%

+0.54%

Volatility

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 1.86%. This indicates that GGMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGMMXMFWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

1.86%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

5.91%

+5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

7.47%

+6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

9.15%

+8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

9.58%

+10.37%

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGMMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGMMX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison

GGMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than MFWIX's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGMMX
Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund
5.75%6.77%0.00%11.14%6.22%14.98%0.54%3.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFWIX
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I
7.99%8.77%9.36%3.98%2.94%10.71%7.53%4.70%3.64%2.36%1.40%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGMMX and MFWIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGMMX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to MFWIX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGMMX dropped -40.23% vs MFWIX's -33.01%.

GGMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGMMX and MFWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer