PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGMMX vs. CSUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GGMMX
Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund
0.61%10.57%1.65%39.12%-16.24%19.30%15.86%3.52%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
8.35%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%9.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGMMX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return.


GGMMX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-7.75%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.29%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*

CSUAX

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
8.35%
6M
8.97%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
7.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGMMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GGMMX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGMMX
GGMMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GGMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GGMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGMMXCSUAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.63

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

2.17

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.36

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.91

10.32

-4.41

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGMMX and CSUAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGMMXCSUAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.63

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.61

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.55

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GGMMX and CSUAX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

GGMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGMMX
Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund
6.73%6.77%0.00%11.14%6.22%14.98%0.54%3.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
7.46%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%

Drawdowns

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGMMX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGMMX and CSUAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GGMMXCSUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-52.20%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-7.98%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.83%

-20.45%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.11%

-4.38%

-3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-8.49%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.83%

+0.87%

Volatility

GGMMX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GGMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GGMMXCSUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.26%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

6.89%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

11.48%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

12.89%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

14.89%

+5.23%