GGME vs. VOO
GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GGME returned 10.10%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
GGME vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.10%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
GGME
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
GGME vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | -0.82% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 7.61% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGME and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GGME and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GGME vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGME
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
GGME
VOO
Communication Services
GGME
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
GGME
VOO
Financial Services
GGME
VOO
Industrials
GGME
VOO
Basic Materials
GGME
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
GGME
-
VOO
Energy
GGME
-
VOO
Healthcare
GGME
-
VOO
Real Estate
GGME
-
VOO
Utilities
GGME
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGME vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GGME
VOO
GGME vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGME | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 2.67 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 11.96 | -11.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGME vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGME | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -33.99% | -35.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -8.90% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -18.69% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -24.52% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | -33.99% | -12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -3.14% | -7.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -3.68% | -10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 1.99% | +9.40% |
Volatility
GGME vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that GGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGME | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 4.83% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 9.82% | +6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.79% | 12.46% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 16.91% | +7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 18.02% | +5.20% |
GGME vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGME vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGME and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 10.10% for GGME. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 10.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGME and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer