PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGME vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGME vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -36.68% return.


GGME

1D
0.28%
1M
3.88%
6M
7.14%
YTD
4.57%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
10.02%

SMST

1D
-12.10%
1M
26.91%
6M
-13.52%
YTD
-36.68%
1Y
223.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGME vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
4.57%16.39%7.89%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-36.68%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GGME and SMST is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGME vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGME
GGME Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGME Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGME vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGMESMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.30

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.63

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

5.07

-4.78

GGME vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGME and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGME vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGMESMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.13%

-99.25%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-85.39%

+60.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.50%

-97.51%

+92.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-90.91%

+76.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.54%

44.25%

-32.71%

Volatility

GGME vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is 5.91%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 57.45%. This indicates that GGME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGMESMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

57.45%

-51.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

136.03%

-119.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

149.51%

-129.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.36%

167.79%

-143.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

167.79%

-144.59%

GGME vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGME vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
0.02%0.17%0.08%2.31%0.76%0.39%0.38%0.50%0.93%0.33%0.16%1.11%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGME and SMST have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (57.45%) compared to GGME (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.39% vs 3.31% for GGME. On fees, GGME is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.39% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GGME is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

GGME has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGME and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer